Edson Gissoni and Rual Rousselet – Executive Partners of DMS PARTNERS
Content also available in audio. Press play:
Impact of Corporate Structure on Medium-Sized Companies: A Comprehensive Analysis
Choosing a company’s corporate structure is a fundamental strategic decision that directly influences its governance, growth, fundraising capacity, and adaptation to market changes. For mid-sized companies, this decision becomes even more relevant as they seek to balance flexibility and control while also seeking to expand and innovate. In this article, we explore how different corporate structures impact growth and expansion, risk management, succession planning, innovation, and adaptation to emerging technologies.
1. Impact of Corporate Structure on Growth and Expansion
Investment Attraction
One of the most notable advantages of a corporate structure is its ability to influence investment acquisition. Companies structured as corporations (SA) have much broader access to the capital markets, allowing them to issue shares and attract external investors. This is crucial for companies seeking accelerated expansion. On the other hand, limited liability companies (Ltda.) , although they offer less complexity and greater control by the partners, have more restricted access to sources of financing, which can limit their growth options.
Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A)
Companies with a formalized structure, such as SAs , have an easier time participating in mergers and acquisitions processes. The defined legal structure facilitates the negotiation of shares, which makes the transaction more transparent and viable. On the other hand, Ltdas may face difficulties, since the transfer of shares is more complex and often depends on the agreement of the partners, which can be an obstacle in M&A processes.
International Expansion
Expanding into international markets requires agile adaptation to local regulations and a robust ability to raise capital. The corporation structure , with its formal governance and flexibility for partnerships and investments, is more adaptable to this type of operation. In contrast, a limited liability company may be more efficient for companies operating locally or in specific markets, but the lack of more structured governance can hinder international expansion.
Governance for Scalability
As a company grows, its governance needs to become more complex and professionalized. Companies with a limited liability company have greater ease in implementing corporate governance systems, such as boards of directors and external audits, which facilitates the scalability of their operations. Companies with a limited liability company structure, on the other hand , although more agile, may face challenges as they expand their operations and require a more robust management structure.
2. Risk Management and Compliance
Legal and Tax Responsibility
The corporate structure defines the legal and tax liability of the partners or shareholders. In a corporation , liability is limited to the value of the shares acquired, which protects the personal assets of investors. In Ltdas , liability is also limited, but more centralized control may create greater exposure in litigation situations. In addition, tax obligations may vary depending on the structure, with corporations being more regulated and subject to a different tax regime than Ltdas .
Conflicts of Interest
Ltdas offer greater flexibility in resolving internal conflicts between partners, since the clauses of the articles of association can be more easily adapted to the needs of the partners. In contrast, SAs have a more formalized system for resolving disputes, which can make the process more transparent, but also more bureaucratic.
Compliance and Regulation
Compliance with industry-specific regulations is crucial to a company’s operations. Companies with a more formal structure, such as limited liability companies , tend to have more rigorous compliance processes in place to meet governance standards and financial market regulations. Limited liability companies , on the other hand, may be more flexible, but the lack of a more formal structure can hinder adaptation to regulatory changes, especially in highly regulated industries.
Heritage Protection
One of the most significant advantages of a limited liability structure, such as LLCs and S corporations , is the protection of the partners’ personal assets. This reduces individual risks in the event of bankruptcy or legal disputes, providing a layer of security for both business and personal assets.
3. Succession Planning and Business Continuity
Family Succession
Succession planning in family businesses is one of the biggest concerns regarding the corporate structure. Companies with a limited liability structure may face challenges in transferring shares to the next generation, especially when the partners do not have a clear plan. Limited liability companies , with their more formalized shares and governance, have an advantage in allowing the creation of clear and documented succession mechanisms, which facilitates the continuity of the business across generations.
Shareholder Agreements and Wills
It is essential for partners, regardless of the structure, to formalize partnership agreements and establish wills that determine how the succession will be carried out. The transparency of these decisions is even more important in corporations , as governance is public and must follow clear rules to avoid disputes. In limited companies , the lack of formality can generate complications in times of transition.
Contingency Plans
Companies must be prepared for unexpected events, such as the death or incapacity of a partner. Companies with more robust structures, such as SAs , generally have better-defined contingency plans, with clear processes for replacing partners or shareholders. Ltdas , on the other hand , may be more agile in short-term adjustments, but the lack of a formalized structure can make long-term planning difficult.
Business Perpetuity
Ensuring business continuity is essential, especially in family businesses. The SA structure is more adaptable to the perpetuity of the business, allowing the addition of new shareholders and internal reorganization in a more fluid manner. Ltda.s , on the other hand, may have more limited continuity, as they depend directly on the stability and agreement between the partners.
4. Innovation and Flexibility
Hybrid Structures
Organizational flexibility can be achieved through hybrid structures , combining features of different types of corporations. A company may opt for a corporation for raising capital, while maintaining a limited liability company for specific units or smaller operations. This approach allows for the best of both worlds: the flexibility of a limited liability company with the robustness of a limited liability company .
Agile Governance
Governance in growing companies needs to be agile. More flexible structures, such as Ltda.s , can respond quickly to market changes. SAs , although slower in terms of decision-making, offer a solid basis for implementing innovations within a more organized governance framework.
Incentive to Innovation
Companies with a corporation structure have a greater capacity to attract investors and finance innovation projects, since they can offer shares and dividends as part of incentive packages. In LLCs , innovation incentives are more dependent on the direct relationship between partners, which may limit the capacity for innovation compared to corporations , which are more open to external participation.
Access to Talent
Talent attraction and retention are facilitated by clear corporate structures. SAs , with their governance advantages and possibilities for incentives through shares, tend to attract qualified professionals, while Ltdas can benefit from flexibility and closer control of the partners.
5. Technologies and Digital Transformation
Digital Governance
The use of technologies to facilitate management, such as ERP systems and online communication tools, is essential for the modernization of companies. SAs , with their structured governance, have an easier time adopting digital tools that allow control and transparency. Ltda.s , which are more flexible, can also implement digital solutions more quickly, but with less formality.
Information Security
In a digital world, protecting data and digital assets is a priority. Companies with robust structures, such as SAs , usually have governance and compliance systems that ensure information security. Ltdas , although they may have security policies, may have more difficulty implementing large-scale protection strategies due to the lack of a formalized structure.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Automation
The impact of artificial intelligence and automation on companies requires a corporate structure that supports technological innovations. LLCs have an advantage in adapting to new technologies, since they can direct investments to research and development areas. LLCs may be faster to adopt new tools, but their ability to scale these innovations may be limited.
Blockchain and Smart Contracts
The use of blockchain and smart contracts promises to revolutionize governance and decision-making in companies. SAs , with their more formalized structure, are better prepared to integrate these technologies into their governance processes, while LLCs may be more flexible in adopting these innovations quickly.
Conclusion:
The corporate structure is an essential pillar for the sustainable growth of medium-sized companies. The choice between a limited liability company and a corporation should be strategic, taking into account not only governance and expansion objectives, but also risk management, succession planning and adaptation to emerging technologies. A careful analysis of these factors can ensure the company’s longevity and success in today’s competitive market.
Komentarze